THENEXTMACH

Re: Engadget's Microsoft Kin Inside Story

  • Ken: Whatchu think?
  • Jaime: Fuck that Lee guy. It's sad to watch. People's egos and emotions ruining such a cool organization.
  • Ken: It's whack that anyone with any integrity would release a project just to fufill a contract knowing it was flawed.
  • Jaime: Fundamentally dude. And not actually achieving the objectives?! It's gross and unethical. The bullshit is that these guys have fiduciary responsibilities to the "shareholders" and so they justify cannibalizing innovation because it deviates from profit for shareholders.
  • Ken: ...
  • Jaime: Every big company fails or transforms into something irrelevant...
  • Ken: But i dont think it does the shareholders any justice in the long term--even in 4-12 months...
  • Jaime: It doesn't -- they're just focused on very immediate returns...
  • Ken: ...Using 2 years of development to release a failed product and buying a company to do so = very poor resource allocations.
  • Jaime: That Lee guy should be fired and/or jailed.

Why Digital Media Sucks: Entrepreneurship vs. the Arts

A colleague recently linked me McMaster’s press release on the launch of Eight: The Hamilton Institute for Interactive Digital Media. The announcement was plastered all over the Unversity’s website with each partnered org offering up your typical sound bites. Mac’s President Peter George had this to say:

We want to be known as the ‘8th-art’ university, but to achieve that distinction will depend on effective collaboration with great partners. Capitalizing on one another’s strengths will create unlimited opportunities for research commercialization, education and training, and economic development and job creation for our region.

In the press release they make claim that digital media is posed to become the ‘8th-art’. Really what he’s saying then is that Mac wants to be known as the Digital Media University. Naming digital media as their mountain to climb sucks. It devalues the underlying objectives Peter George names explicitly—but more on that in a moment.

McMaster has put their money where their mouth is; they’ve taken a programmatic approach to scholastic R&D and they have a huge opportunity—and the students fortunate enough to take part—to make a dent in key industries while creating new products and services through successful commercialized research projects. This announcement marks the University’s next steps in forming private-public-partnerships where institutions collaborate at every level. With a number of industrial zones planned, the school has also secured substantial government funding and are certainly on the path to crushing it. As as spectator it’s been really exciting watching a master plan practically executed with such a high-degree of integrity.

Like with my alma mater, McMaster has situated itself as a City Building leader in Hamilton. For those of you have visited Hamilton’s west-end in the last 5 years you may have expected such an announcement.  Led by strong relationships with the municipal government, the University secured plots of land previously dedicated to industry and manufacturing. First steps included tearing down existing buildings and converting the various brownfield sites into a viable research research park. Driving into Hamilton on the weekend I saw the development firsthand and it is impressive. What started as an ambitious site plan has turned into a hub for the entire region to rally behind. The planning and execution by Mac has completely revitalized parts of Hamilton that had been considered dead and forgotten.

With Eight however, this emphasis on digital media is a total wank. McMaster, like others, has jumped on the digital media bandwagon. To me digital media is like this cutesy—often ambiguous—qualifier that allows an institution to say ‘we’re trying something new’ and claim that ‘failure is an option’. It sucks. If digital media is art then this whole notion of commercialized research goes out the window also. How can you instill necessary skill sets like innovation and entrepreneurship to a group of students for example, if their work is rooted in aesthetics? As much as I want to regard things like product design, economic development and commerce as art I understand that it’s impossible. Practically applying concepts to any problem/opportunity for the purpose of funding research, driving development and creating jobs is not art—it’s entrepreneurship and innovation.

I get that digital media is a broadly sweeping qualifier and can leave the doors open to many opportunities.  I also respect and appreciate the efforts made by Mac but ultimately loathe their branding decisions here. To me the name of any space is the ultimate tell-all. Brand can be a powerful authenticity tool and I think Mac may be setting themselves up for limited success. If it were up to me I would have called the space WEWOGMASOMFUM: The Digital Design and Creation Institute. Silly right? Not when WEWOGMASOMFUM translates to We Want Our Grads to Make So Much Fucking Money.

Personally, I’d much rather climb a mountain called WEWOGMASOMFUM than one called digital media.

[Electronic media] have become an essential feature of modern life because they have helped to mitigate the disruption of stable community ties that has been a characteristic of our era…

The loosening of these ties has also resulted in a greater degree of privatization in our lives; in a rapidly changing and often bewildering world, we retreat to the stability and security of our homes…

For many people, the electronic media fill a void by bringing into their private environments information and entertainment that helps to mitigate their aloneness.

Volti, R. (1995). Society and Technological Change, 3rd Edition. Chapter 12: The Electronic Media, p. 205. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Wisdom is knowing what to do next, skill is knowing how to do it, and virtue is doing it.
— David Starr Jordan
spime:

Visual Hearing Aid combines the function of both the visual and hearing aid to display what other people are saying via two projectors to the user. The device uses speech to text translation software on embedded controllers to display the speech as text via two micro-projectors.

Ill. 

spime:

Visual Hearing Aid combines the function of both the visual and hearing aid to display what other people are saying via two projectors to the user. The device uses speech to text translation software on embedded controllers to display the speech as text via two micro-projectors.

Ill. 

My Weekend at Lake Rosseau via OpenMode.ca

My Weekend at Lake Rosseau via OpenMode.ca

[Technology is] the principles, processes, and nomenclatures of the more conspicuous arts, particularly those which involve application of science, and which may be considered useful by promoting the benefit of society, together with the emolument of those who pursue them.
— Bigelow, J. (1829) Harvard Lecture Series: Elements of Technology

There is interpretative flexibility both in the understanding of technologies and in their design. We should see trajectories of technologies as the result of rhetorical operations, defining the users of artifacts, their uses, and the problems that particular designs solve…

the success of an artifact depends in large part upon the strength and size of the group that takes it up and promotes it. Its definition depends upon the associations that different actors make.

Interpretive flexibility is thus a necessary feature of artifacts, because what an artifact does and how well it performs are the results of a competition of different groups’ claims. Thus the good design of [an artifact] cannot be the move behind its success; good design is instead the result of its success.

Sismondo, S. (2004) An Introduction to Science and Technology StudiesChapter 8MA: Blackwell Publishing.
When driving adoption and proliferation of any system in a society, in addition to each contributor’s nascent desire to shape the world around them one also requires the effective cooperation of those individuals.
— Sorgente, J. (2010). Reasons For Success: The American Manufacturing System, Tutorial Assignment — Scientific Technology and Society in the Twentieth Century, Ryerson University.

These [scientific engineering] microhistories, however, cannot overrule the macrohistorical patterns and trends, any more than the macrohistory should not make us blind to local and temporal irregularities and contingencies.

What these microhistorical irregularities and contingencies reflect is the essential instability inherent in boundary objects.

The flexibility of a boundary object induces various, and even conflicting, elements as its constituents, but the same flexibility contributes to its instability. However, this instability can be a resource for its dynamics. A flexible, unstable boundary object is like the motion of the bicycle: the instability remains constructive as long as it is pushed forward

— Hong, Sungook (1999) ‘Historiographical layers in the relationship between science and technology’, History and Technology, 15: 4, 289 — 311